
The U.S. imposed tariffs on single malt scotch whisky on Oct. 18, 2019. The impact could be felt in higher prices and lower sales, and it has distillers, importers, and retailers worried.
Scotch Importers And Distillers Struggle Against Trump's Whisky Tariffs
November 4, 2019 –––––– Zak Kostro
Your favorite bottle of whisky could soon carry a heftier price tag thanks to 25% tariffs the U.S. began imposing on Oct. 18 stemming from a 15-year international fight over the airplane industry. The tariffs target around $7.5 billion of European goods—including single malt scotch and whiskeys from Northern Ireland. “This is a really serious situation for the industry,” Scotch Whisky Association strategy and communications director Graeme Littlejohn tells Whisky Advocate. “And particularly for our small and mid-size member companies, who predominantly deal in single malt.”Littlejohn notes that after the EU imposed a 25% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey in 2018 in response to U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs, exports to the EU dropped by 21%. “We would expect a similar, if not larger, market loss from the more recent U.S. tariffs— something around [a] $130 million [loss] in the first year,” he says. “That would obviously be a very damaging situation for the industry as a whole.”Scotch importers and spirits companies now face difficult choices leading up to the busy holiday selling season, although few are openly commenting on their intentions. Bruichladdich said on Twitter that it would levy a 25% increase on U.S. orders, but declined multiple requests from Whisky Advocate to clarify or expand on its statement. Diageo referred Whisky Advocate to a prepared statement, but didn't respond to multiple requests for additional comment. “We will be taking measures to mitigate the effect of these tariffs on our scotch single malts and liqueurs portfolio,” a spokesperson for the company said. “As a result, we do not expect a material impact to our business. We continue to closely monitor this dispute and would not be immune from a further escalation. We are concerned, however, about the impact on smaller, independent scotch distillers and the damage this could do to industry exports and jobs across Scotland.” Pernod Ricard declined to comment, while William Grant & Sons told Whisky Advocate that the company is “fully aligned with the Scotch Whisky Association's position on this matter, and defer to them for comment.”
Prepared for the Worst
But several importers were willing to talk about what the tariffs will mean for their businesses. Raj Sabharwal—founding partner of Glass Revolution Imports, which imports a range of single malts—tells Whisky Advocate that his company put a shipment on hold as soon as he learned that the World Trade Organization had given its formal go-ahead for the U.S. to impose the trade sanctions; the shipment would have arrived after the Oct. 18 deadline. “We didn't want the container coming in, and then being shocked at the prices,” Sabharwal says. “Our main concern was selling goods into the marketplace at a higher price, and then when the tariffs were removed, having higher-priced whiskies in the retail system—this would be very difficult for distributors, retailers, and consumers.”Fortunately, Sabharwal had already prepared a temporary buffer. “We did stock up on some items in anticipation of the tariff,” he says, noting that the strategy has paid off in the short term. “We're seeing an uptick in sales because people want to try and grab product before it ultimately goes up in price”—something Sabharwal sees as inevitable if the tariffs continue, although he's working with his suppliers to minimize any impact on consumers' wallets. “We are obviously hoping that the tariff is short-lived,” he adds. “If not, the result will be increased prices for consumers, and most likely a decline in [sales of] Scottish single malts.”Sabharwal acknowledges that smaller companies like his are more vulnerable than the industry's juggernauts. “Being a small importer, I think we would be more negatively affected, because the big brands—Diageo, Brown-Forman, Pernod [Ricard]—have their own import companies in the U.S. that are able to absorb” some of the cost, he notes.But Sabharwal's main concern is how the measure could ultimately affect single malt fans stateside. “It's not the supplier or the producer that pays [the tariff],” he explains, but rather the importer. “Then it multiplies into the retail consumer chain. By the time the consumers get [the whisky], it could have a 20% to 24% price difference. For somebody used to paying $40 a bottle, and all of a sudden, it's $50, that's going to be significant.”“The tariffs are one of the worst things to happen to this industry since World War II.” —David Othenin-Girard, K&L Wine MerchantsBefore the tariffs went into effect, Sam Filmus—president and co-founder of ImpEx Beverages, which imports Islay single malts Kilchoman and Port Askaig—airfreighted 19 additional pallets of single malt to last through the holiday selling season. As a boutique importer, “we are very, very scared about how the tariffs will impact us, our suppliers, our prices, and, at the end of the day, the consumer that enjoys our whisky,” he says. Moving forward, Filmus and Kilchoman founder and managing director Anthony Wills agreed to swallow the cost of the tariffs, at least through next March, splitting it fifty-fifty to spare consumers from higher prices. “I think in the long run, it is going to be beneficial for the brand,” Filmus says. “[It will allow] more people to get a hold of the bottles they're shopping for.”But that doesn't mean ImpEx or the distillers they work with can absorb the cost indefinitely. “It's my hope and belief that the tariffs are temporary,” Filmus says. “However, we need to be prepared for the worst.” He suspects a 25% increase on a collectible Port Askaig 45 year old that already sells for $2,000 could be more than some consumers are willing to spend. “This is what causes sleepless nights,” Filmus says. “We're trying to build this business [but] people will not be able to buy whisky anymore because it's so expensive.”